Pettiford605EdmundCondemnation

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

AntiTrustDeceptiveTradeRICOSHARONvsCitySt.PaulAmyBrendmoenMikeHahnMayorMelvinCarter2019

Subject: Re: City StPaul Meeting Council on 4/17/2019Unconstitutional OrdinancesLegalNotice
                             Fri.12Apr2019
         Wilful Neglience of Government Officials to Answer,Investigate.
                 Legal              ISSUES
                          WELCOME TO OUR PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP MON.15APR2019
                                    DEATH AND TAXES COME TO ALL
                                 a. CitySt.Paul,MN Sanctuary cannot handle anymore Illegals.
                                   http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com
 April 12th, 2019
 
Editor’s Note: The Minnesota legislature will be on their annual Easter – Passover break next week.  Enjoy your respite from the DFL’s $12 billion tax hike.  We also trust House Speaker Melissa Hortman is looking forward to the break.  She’s had a tough month, what with the broken promises about omnibus bills, the packing of incendiary policy issues crammed into spending bills, and the internal strife in her own caucus between the far Left and the far, far Left members.
From: sharon4anderson@aol.com  APR.2019 Please track City St. Paul Unconstitutional Ordinances 
To: http://saintpaultrash.com/downloads.htm?fbclid=IwAR0PrXft5EIk_ARlOa6LS2eQriFtGT0RWmBhfWgiSmtqtbvYuPvBeRrt7sI#CivilPenalties
                          Trash Hauling effects All Propertys in St. Paul
stpaultrash.com





Sent: 1/15/2019 12:33:23 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: U.S. Attorney | USAO-MN | DOJ ERICA MACDONALD

                                 So much research out there, will file something with Police Chief, then Co Attorney, then Muslin Keith Elison MNAG THEN TO US Erica MacDonald, hopefully William Barr will be Confirmed.
                                 Your Cases are so Relevant Forensic Files etc.
                                      Going Blind but for the City must be held Accountable
                                       https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

                         Reading 

Cases the RICO was never address by Fed. Judge Ann Montgomery  also involved in the Murder of my Husband Cpl Jim Anderson who spent 1 year at Brainard State Hosp. She and Lonnie Bryan and David Lillhaug at that time were Complicit. http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com 

                                 For now Amy Brendmoen and her Lover or 2nd husband Mike Hahn must be held Accountable.  Theft of Car, Water,Trailer etc. http://sharon4anderson.org

 Tues 15Jan2019

                                      some of my links have expired, phone RESTORED.
                          https://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

etc.                 HOWEVER     QUESTIONS 4 CRIMINAL RICO COMPLAINTS.
                              1.     Has the City St. Paul,MN creating Anti Trust, Deceptive Trade, via Citizens Propertys by and thro Excessive Inspections/Abatments, without Valid Complaints,Quiet Titles,

Federal and state antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, and the opportunity of competitors to engage in business free of artificial restrictions on competition. Such restrictions include price fixing agreements, group boycotts, “tying” arrangements, and market allocation arrangements. Antitrust laws also make it illegal to operate a monopoly and abuse the power of one who has a monopolistic market position. Antitrust laws are enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and similar state agencies and state Attorneys General.

 Minnesota and many other states have adopted the Federal Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (UDTPA), originally passed in 1964 and revised in 1966.

                   3.  Front Coverhttps://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609



CRIMES AGAINST REPUTATION
609.765CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.
609.77FALSE INFORMATION TO NEWS MEDIA.

How Do I Fi
RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (RICO)
609.901CONSTRUCTION OF RACKETEERING PROVISIONS.
609.902DEFINITIONS.
609.903RACKETEERING.
609.904CRIMINAL PENALTIES.
609.905CRIMINAL FORFEITURE.
609.907PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE.
609.908DISPOSITION OF FORFEITURE PROCEEDS.
609.909ADDITIONAL RELIEF AVAILABLE.
609.910RELATION TO OTHER SANCTIONS.
609.911CIVIL REMEDIES.
609.912NOTICE TO OTHER PROSECUTING AUTHORITIES
le a Consumer Complaint in Minnesota?
The Minnesota Attorney General's office provides a good explanation of its consumer complaint process, with links to the necessary forms, contact information, and step-by-step instructions for filing your complaint. Call their office at (651) 296-3353 if have additional questions.
Research the Law



             
City Council1/16/2019Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd Floor
Legislative Hearing Items and Public Hearings at 3:30 p.m. (No 5:30 p.m. Public Hearings)
Meeting detailsAgenda Agenda
   
RLH AR 18-108272Excessive/Abatement Service June 22 to July 20, 2018Resolution LH Assessment RollRatifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services during June 22 to July 20, 2018. (File No. J1903E, Assessment No. 198302)
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
1/12/2019 5:40 PMSharonScarrellaAndersonAgainstpg 26 Sharon Lee Anderson 697 Surrey Av http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com OBJECTIONS St Paul MN 55106-5521 *697 SURREY AVE *Ward: 7 *Pending as of: 9/11/2018 LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46 Excessive Inspection 1.00 122.00 $122.00 32-29-22-41-0053 Real Estate Admin Fee 35.00 1.00 $35.00 $157.00 *** Owner and Taxpayer *** ** PLEASE NOTE ** 16 037125 Inv# 1381607 New Direction Ira Inc C/O Vincent Bryan Ira 1070 W Century Dr Ste 101 Louisville CO 80027-1657 *1639

RES 19-8917Legislative Hearings
City of Saint Paul
Meeting Agenda
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Marcia Moermond, Legislative Hearing Officer
Mai Vang, Hearing Coordinator
Jean Birkholz, Hearing Secretary
legislativehearings@ci.stpaul.mn.us
651-266-8585
Thursday, April 11, 2019 9:00 AM Room 330 City Hall & Court House
9:00 a.m. Hearings
1 RLH TA
Excessive/Abatement Service Sept 24 to Oct 19, 2018Resolution
Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during September 24 to October 19, 2018, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for March 5, 2019





Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

CitySt.Paul,MNConstitutionalityExcessConsumption/Inspection 2019

Sent: 1/9/2019 1:54:00 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: St.PaulCityCertify/RatifyExcessiveConsumptionbasedonFRAUD

                 BUILD THE WALL FOLLOW THE LAW OR DFL CONGRESS WILL FALL.














                                   2018 Calendar deleted

 LEGAL SERVICE,NOTICE OBJECTIONS.CONSTITUTIONALITY
                           EXCESSIVE CONSUMPTION/INSPECTIONS
                           Memorandum of briefs below before deletions.
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Wed. 9Jan2019
                             TO THE ABOVE NAMED; State of MN Tim Walz,all Agencys,Ramsey Co, Auditor Chris Samuels et al,City St.
Paul,MN Melvin Carter,Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Mike Hahn et al.
                                 QUESTIONS
          Is the City St. Paul,MN ITS Mayor, Council enbanc,Agencys,Empl
oyees so Ignorant of the Law, Constitutional Quarantees of Homeowners, Disabled, Seniors to Ratify/Certfy Fees of Excessive Consumption now renamed Inspection.
                          a. Without Valid Compl
aints,physical presence of DSI,reports.
                          b. Malfeasance,Misfeasance,Nonfeasance to answer any/all
                              electric Documents,Social Media, Blogs.
                          c. To Railroad Fidicuary Duties via Consent Agenda
                               to Create Debt, on unspecting property owners.
                           d. Reprisals as Widow Mrs.
Sharon Scarrella Anderson
                               Loyal Trump Supporter.

                          

MayorMelvinCarterPonziTaxingSchemeExcessiveConsumption VS WhiteWidowSharonAnderson

                              Fri.4Jan2019     City going Bonkers/Bankrupt
                    QUESTION HAS BLACK MAYOR MELVIN CARTER FORSAKEN
                    BAPTIST SIHLO CHURCH TO INVOKE MUSLIN AND SHARIA LAW.

                    Approx 80 Propertys each Excessive Inspection 2 or 3 on Agenda Jan 2019
                              Round 20thous X5  100K Revenue in a 2 month Basis
                                    Todd Hurley gone Now Lyn Moser ?



lOVE my Trumpy Heart and Soul to protect the American People cc Rush Limbaug Trumpy the Trooper4Truth Nancy Pelosi must look at her own Border Wall, re Corruption Start with the DFL Chair Tom Perez, former Justice Attorney, appointed by Obama, then Hud Commissioner, it took me hours to find
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
re




                                      Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug.

                                       Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community. In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth
Magner vGallagher ... 10-1032, 8th Cir. Not Argued, Feb 14, 2012, N/A ... Brief for Steve Magner et al. Amicus Briefs ... Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al. Amicus ..

Magner v. Gallagher


Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
10-10328th Cir.Not ArguedFeb 14, 2012N/AN/AOT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
JudgmentDismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

Certiorari-stage documents


LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch

Law.com Newswire

Politico Top Stories - Politics, Political News

Followers