CitySt.Paul,MNConstitutionalityExcessConsumption/Inspection 2019

Sent: 1/9/2019 1:54:00 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: St.PaulCityCertify/RatifyExcessiveConsumptionbasedonFRAUD

 https://sharons-courtrecords.blogspot.com

                 BUILD THE WALL FOLLOW THE LAW OR DFL CONGRESS WILL FALL.

https://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

                                   2018 Calendar deleted

 LEGAL SERVICE,NOTICE OBJECTIONS.CONSTITUTIONALITY

                           EXCESSIVE CONSUMPTION/INSPECTIONS

                           Memorandum of briefs below before deletions.

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Wed. 9Jan2019

                             TO THE ABOVE NAMED; State of MN Tim Walz,all Agencys,Ramsey Co, Auditor Chris Samuels et al,City St.

Paul,MN Melvin Carter,Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Mike Hahn et al.

                                 QUESTIONS

          Is the City St. Paul,MN ITS Mayor, Council enbanc,Agencys,Empl

oyees so Ignorant of the Law, Constitutional Quarantees of Homeowners, Disabled, Seniors to Ratify/Certfy Fees of Excessive Consumption now renamed Inspection.

                          a. Without Valid Compl

aints,physical presence of DSI,reports.

                          b. Malfeasance,Misfeasance,Nonfeasance to answer any/all

                              electric Documents,Social Media, Blogs.

                          c. To Railroad Fidicuary Duties via Consent Agenda

                               to Create Debt, on unspecting property owners.

                           d. Reprisals as Widow Mrs.

Sharon Scarrella Anderson

                               Loyal Trump Supporter.

EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES https://realestate.findlaw.com/landlord-tenant-law/fair-housing-laws-complaints-and-lawsuits.html

                          

MayorMelvinCarterPonziTaxingSchemeExcessiveConsumption VS WhiteWidowSharonAnderson

                              Fri.4Jan2019     City going Bonkers/Bankrupt

                    QUESTION HAS BLACK MAYOR MELVIN CARTER FORSAKEN

                    BAPTIST SIHLO CHURCH TO INVOKE MUSLIN AND SHARIA LAW.

                    Approx 80 Propertys each Excessive Inspection 2 or 3 on Agenda Jan 2019

                              Round 20thous X5  100K Revenue in a 2 month Basis

                                    Todd Hurley gone Now Lyn Moser ?

lOVE my Trumpy Heart and Soul to protect the American People cc Rush Limbaug Trumpy the Trooper4Truth Nancy Pelosi must look at her own Border Wall, re Corruption Start with the DFL Chair Tom Perez, former Justice Attorney, appointed by Obama, then Hud Commissioner, it took me hours to find
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

re

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com

                                      Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug.

                                       Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community. In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

Magner v. Gallagher ... 10-1032, 8th Cir. Not Argued, Feb 14, 2012, N/A ... Brief for Steve Magner et al. Amicus Briefs ... Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al. Amicus ..

Magner v. Gallagher

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

• Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston)
• Petition of the day (Conor McEvily)

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

• Brief for Steve Magner et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

• Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
• Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
• Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
• Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
• Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
• Brief of the American Bankers Association et al. 

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

• Brief of the United States

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

• Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

• Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
• Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al. 
• Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
• Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al. 
• Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al. 
• Brief of the ACLU
• Brief of Massachusetts et al.
• Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
• Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action

Certiorari-stage documents

• Opinion below (8th Cir.)
• Petition for certiorari
• Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
• Petitioners' reply

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch