...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. 

AMENDMENT V

Teacher's Companion Lesson (PDF)

The drafter of this clause, James Madison, opined: "A Government is instituted to protect property of every sort...This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own." Against the proposition that the singular purpose of our government is the protection of property, there is the curiosity that the original Constitution scarcely mentions the term. Although at least two states demanded every other provision that we know today as the Bill of Rights, not one requested the Takings Clause. What explains the anomaly?

The beginning of an answer can be found in Alexander Hamilton's observation that "the true protection of men's rights are to be found not among old parchments, or musty records. They are written...in the whole volume of human nature...and can never be erased or obscured." Alexander Hamilton was, of course, referring to the natural law, which is one of the doctrinal foundations of the United States s

                             Fri.5Sept2019

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

1983BerniceA.PETERSON,Tenant in Common 1058Summit

Clerk Fred Grittner illegally acting as Justice

SharonsHS1058SummitAveSt.PAUL,MN Taxes paid.

Cars.Trailer Illegally taken 697Surrey St.Paul,MN

1058Summitsold,FraudTaxes were paid

1058SummitHS,448Desnoyer,2194Marshall6unit325Nwlder Taken illegally without Just Compensations 

1058 Summit Illegally sold and Flipped over 10Timescontraryto HudGuidelinesandAndersons ADA Disabilitys 

                                  To the Above Named ; Candidates,Media,Courts,Council,Mayor etal

                   Affiant Candidate Ward2, Sharon Anderson must also be known as the St. Paul Ghost Whisper.  and or Sharon4Safety,Sanity,Sexuality,Seniors.

                             is not a Liar or Lawyer     http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

                        

                  Humble Plea not to defame or Libel with Malice, must cite the entire council

specifically Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Neske, current 2nd husband Mike Hahm Director of parks and rec.

                   Rebecca Noecker is no Rosalie Butler, altho She is pretty and looks like.

  In the Matter of Trust

                    Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer, Open City Hall to these Secret Meeting of Court Litigation, next one Wed.11Sept2019 re HRA Chair Chris Tolbert, Lawyer, Asst.Hennepin Co. Attorney, with Boss Mike Freeman.

                    Council at Secret Legal Meetings, while Candidates, is not right.

City Attorney Lyndsey must have on her Government page listing of all Litigation vs. City St. Paul,MN similar to https://stpaultrash.com/referendum-lawsuit-court-filings/

                     If Lawyers are making Deals costing Taxpayers a Fortune.

                      Sharons Ghost Whispers hash tags Charlie McCarty,Roslie Butles,City Charter,Ethics,Mayors, sharon Scarrella, Bernice Peterson,etal.

City Council

Agenda status:

Final

Meeting date/time:

9/11/2019 2:00 PM

Minutes status:

Draft

Meeting location:

310 W Conference Room Closed Door Session, immediately following the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting, to discuss pending litigation in First Baptist Church of St. Paul, et al v. City of Saint Paul and Christina Anderson, et al v. City of Saint Paul

Published agenda:

Agenda

Published minutes:

Not available

Meeting video:

Not available

Attachments:

• Meeting Items (0)
• Public Comments (1)

 Add New Comment

1 record Group Export

File # Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action 9/5/2019 8:00 PM Ward2CandidateSharon4Anderson Secret Meetings re Law Suits must also reopen USSC11032 TITLED Magner vs Gallagher http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com

               Similar to

Magner v. Gallag
Magner v. Gallagher (10-1032) | LII Supreme Court Bulletin | LII / Legal Information Instituteher (10-1032) | LII Supreme Court Bulletin 

...

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

https://www.law.cornell.edu › supct › cert › 10-1032Feb 29, 2012 -

 The Supreme Court's decision may affect the extent to which city officials can use ordinances, code enforcement actions, and other land-use ...

You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 5/31/19

                              Similar to Martha Stewart, Jail Time,

she was found guilty and sentenced on July 16, 2004, to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years' probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice.

                   Amy must be charged as Council President Sponsor of Consent Agenda's,  Cooking the Books of weekly Consent Agenda's without decending to particulars or individual cases. re Housing Stock, similar to ImClone.

                   Delegating Legislative Authority/Jurisdiction to her hand picked Leg. Hearing Officer Marcia Mormond, without Public Preview of Executive DSI Inspectors, names, re alleged Code Violations,

                       Amys 2nd Husband Mike Hahm Parks Rec, who do the Clean up, chargedA Congressional hearing on improprieties at ImClone, held in October 2002, unveiled a culture of corruption dating back to 1986. This was the year that ImClone CEO Waksal first forged the signature of the company's general counsel John Landes (one of the three original employees
ImClone stock trading case - Wikipedia to Property Taxes with 4.5% interest.

                  

PROSECUTING MARTHA STEWART: THE OVERVIEW ...

https://www.nytimes.com › 2003/06/05 › business › prosecuting-martha-ste...

Jun 4, 2003 - Martha Stewart is indicted on charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice ... Stewart of insider trading and several investors of Martha Stewart ...

                 
what song has but my eyes still see lyrics - Google Search

(96) The Tremeloes - Silence is Golden - YouTube

(96) Simon & Garfunkel - The Sound of Silence (from The Concert in Central Park) - YouTube

                                  THEREFORE;

                   Candidate Sharon must bring up the Ghost of the Past Council, all Legal Cases vs. City St. Paul,MN past and present as Precedants

                           re; Current

xx  https://stpaultrash.com/referendum-lawsuit-court-filings/

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com   http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

In a message dated 9/4/2019 3:42:22 PM Central Standard Time, John@mannillowomack.com writes:

Saint Paul STRONG

 The Six Principles of Saint Paul STRONG are:

 SAFETY: We pledge to make public safety our top priority, maintaining efficient and effective first responder systems and enhancing citizen/community relationships with police, fire and other city departments.

TRUST: We will work to make sure full and informed citizen participation comes before decisions are made —not after—and put the interests of all the people, including the affected communities and the intended beneficiaries, ahead of personal or partisan interests.

RESPONSIBLE: We believe city officials must be accountable to all citizens—including persons of color, seniors, persons with disabilities, low-income residents, immigrants and refugees—and that they must be fully engaged to the public, not parties, and must respond to citizen concerns in a timely and nonpartisan fashion.

OPEN: We will break down the barriers that exclude citizen participation and bring decision-making back into the public arena where it belongs; ensuring taxpayers are fully informed and have an opportunity to participate meaningfully in decision making.

NEIGHBORHOODS: We pledge to strengthen community voices and to work—across ward boundaries— to foster stronger neighborhoods with equal right and access to the resources and amenities of our city.

GENERATIONS: Understanding that our city was built by generations of people who loved it as we do, we pledge to build a stronger, safer and more beautiful city for the generations that will come after us.

Saint Paul STRONG is a nonpartisan community-led organization dedicated to improving open and representative government in Saint Paul.

New HUD Regulations2019CandidateWard2CouncilSharonAnderson

HUD Proposes New Regulations to Clarify Disparate Impacts – Comments Due Oct. 18, 2019 | LAW OF THE LAND

                         Sun.25Aug2019

       Thanks Megan,Spaar,Nurses et al Republicans, Fred Melo.

                  Affiant Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella

                  Does not seek Endorsements in the Non Partisan

                  Race4St.Paul Council. Combining Answers.

                  FURTHER AFFIANT is blind in L Eye, Stress of Citys

                  Bizzare Fee,Taxing Ponzi Scheme to Steal Realestate

                  via Excessive Inspections, railroaded Via Consent Agenda's

                  on a Weekly Basis.must be addressed.

                  Sharon and Frank Steinhauser and all others must be made Whole
Magner v. Gallagher | Cato Institute

                    USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher, RICO CLAIMS

                    not addressed.

                         

            THEREFORE;

                   Please refer to Sharons Chamber Answers

http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson-ward-2.html

Dear Sharon Anderson,

My name is Morgan Hess, and I'm the Youth Vote Project Coordinator at the League of Women Voters St. Paul. I am putting together the LWVSP's voter guide for the 2019 St. Paul local elections and would like to ask you a few questions for information for the voter guide. I would like your answers to the below questions by September 3 at the latest, if possible. Please keep your answers to one or two sentences each. They may be edited slightly for length and clarity. If you have questions, feel free to reply to this email and I'll get back to you quickly.

What are your biggest priorities?

RealEstate Issues,Exposing Citys Ponzi Taxing Schemes,Senior and Public Safety Issues

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

How will you work to address the housing shortage in St. Paul?

Expose Citys  Neglience  to be held Accountable https://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/

Quiet Titles,Marketable, Fiscal Disparities etc.  Bravo to 
SaintPaulTrash.com - Documents to Download

How will you address the issue of distrust between residents and public safety officers?

Educate,Full Discloures, Ethics, Go Public with Forensic Files with no Fear of Reprisals.
Sharon4Council: Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. Paul

How do you plan to work with and engage residents to craft policy?

                 By filing4Office not to Win but for to make Politicans Accountable, Compliance with USA Constitution

 Expose the DFL Obama appointed Lawyer Tom Perez Nat.DFL Chair,former Asst. AG, then Hud Commissioner,Labor,

                  In the DFL Dirty Deals https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

.

 Loyal Trump Republican; White,Widow,Whistleblower

                 former Candidate http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

                              http://sharon4anderson.org Forensic Files.

Thank you.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

In a message dated 8/24/2019 9:24:25 AM Central Standard Time,mhess@macalester.edu writes:

-Morgan Hess

League of Women Voters St. Paul

Bobby Goldman
Government Affairs Director
Saint Paul Area Association of REALTORS®
325 Roselawn Avenue East
Saint Paul, MN  55117
bgoldman@spaar.com
Cell: 651.280.9917

Robert Harter

Government Affairs Administrative Assistant

Minnesota Nurses Association

651-202-7078

HUD Proposes New Regulations to Clarify Disparate Impacts – Comments Due Oct. 18, 2019

On August 19, 2019 the Department of Housing and Urban Development published a proposed new regulation to among other things, “amend HUD’s interpretation of the Fair Housing Act’s disparate impact standard to better reflect the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.,…”    See, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/19/2019-17542/huds-implementation-of-the-fair-housing-acts-disparate-impact-standard

DNC Chair Tom Perez: Socialist Ocasio-Cortez Is “The Future Of Our Party”

CitySt.Paul,MNCandidateFilingsSharonAndersonWard2etal

St. Paul
	Council Member Ward 2 (St. Paul)
		Candidate Name	Party	Website	File Date
		Sharon Anderson	Nonpartisan	http://sharon4council.blogspot.com	7/30/2019
		Lindsay Ferris Martin	Nonpartisan	lindsayferrismartinforcitycouncilward2.business.site	7/30/2019
		Bill Hosko	Nonpartisan	hosko4ward2.org	8/13/2019
		Helen Meyers	Nonpartisan	www.TheMilitant.com	8/12/2019
		Rebecca Noecker	Nonpartisan	www.rebeccanoecker.com

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Julian and DFL Chair Tom Perez 

Executing the Quid Pro Quo................................................................................................... 14 THE QUID PRO QUO EXPLAINED.......................................................................................... 17 The Agreement Was a Quid Pro Quo Exchange .................................................................... 18 Assistant Attorney General Perez Facilitated the Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo ........... 21 The Initial Stages of the Quid Pro Quo Confused and Frustrated Career Attorneys ............. 23 HUD’s Purported Reasons for Its Changed Recommendation in Newell Are Unpersuasive and a Pretext for HUD’s Desired Withdrawal of Magner...................................................... 26 The “Consensus” that Emerged for Declining Intervention in Newell Directly Resulted from Assistant Attorney General Perez’s Stewardship of the Quid Pro Quo......................... 31 As Discussions Stalled, Assistant Attorney General Perez Took the Lead and Personally Brokered the Agreement......................................................................................................... 34 The Department of Justice Sacrificed a Strong Case Alleging a “Particularly Egregious Example” of Fraud to Execute the Quid Pro Quo with the City of St. Paul .......................... 37 Assistant Attorney General Perez Offered to Provide the City of St. Paul with Assistance in Dismissing Newell’s Complaint ............................................................................................. 40 Assistant Attorney General Perez Attempted to Cover Up the Presence of Magner as a Factor in the Intervention Decision on Newell ....................................................................... 42 Assistant Attorney General Perez Made Statements to the Committees that Were Largely Contradicted by Other Testimony and Documentary Evidence ............................................. 45 The Ethics and Professional Responsibility Opinions Obtained by Assistant Attorney General Perez Were Not Sufficient to Cover His Actions...................................................... 49 The Department of Justice Likely Violated the Spirit and Intent of the False Claims Act by Internally Calling the Quid Pro Quo a “Settlement”.............................................................. 50 The Quid Pro Quo Exposed Management Failures Within the Department of Justice.......... 53

 Disclaimer Will Scann in Exhibits Reasons, Forensic Evidence. Scrool to Ward 2 Candidates 

 http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/saint-paul.html

Hello Sharon,

This is a confirmation that we received your affidavit of candidacy and money order for filing today via express mail. You may see all filings at https://candidates.sos.state.mn.us/.

Thank you,

Ramsey County Elections

90 West Plato Blvd., Suite 160

Saint Paul, MN 55107

(651)-266-2171

www.ramseycounty.us

NEW: Ethics Complaint Filed against Rep. Ilhan Omar--Marriage, Immigrati...

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-house-ethics-complaint-against-rep-ilhan-omar-over-potential-immigration-marriage-tax-and-student-loan-fraud/

                Thurs.25July2019

U.S. District Judge Michael J. Davis faces a decision on sending convicted Islamic State sympathizers to prison or to a “deradicalization” program. PHOTO: JERRY HOLT/MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE/ZUMA PRESS

https://www.wsj.com/articles/deradicalization-programs-face-critical-test-in-islamic-state-cases-1479084156

                    Fri.26July2019         Newly Discovered

           NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW,CONSTITUTIONS AND EVEN THE QUORAN.
Ilhan Omar Could be Deported Because of This Lawsuit

Next, Klayman pointed to the fact that Omar was living in Kenya when she was granted citizenship.

DISCLAIMER; Sharon tracking USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher

cannot afford to open the Files via Federal Judge Michael Davis,

          IN THE MATTER OF MINNESOTA MUSLIN CONGRESS WOMAN

              IIHAN OMAR AKA Ilhan Nur Said Elmi^{[1]  OTHERS AS INTEREST APPEAR.}

                                      VS

              CANDIDATE RELATOR WHITE,WIDOW,WHISTLEBLOWER

                     SHARON ANDERSON ET AL

       Affiant Sick and Tired of City St. Paul in their Patterned Enterprise

Complaints here with made via email,social media etc.

                   Can;t open the Files with Federal Judge dfl Michael Davis, wilful failure to address or have Jury Trial on Citys RICO ACTS or refer to Justice Dept or FBI.

                    Sharon again Candidate Ward 2 from her Legal Domicile at 1058 Summit St. Paul,MN Equity skimming for years. http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

                    https://freedom-4you.blogspot.com/2008/08/

                        Mr. Kindness Lenny Anderson Trash Testimony

https://lennycarolanderson.blogspot.com/

Sharon Anderson Ward 2

---

From: sharon4anderson@aol.com

Sent: 7/25/2019 3:02:03 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Ethics Complaint Filed Against Ilhan Omar For Alleged Fraud – Right Wing Folks

                                   Fri.25July2019

                  Kevin,Dave Chaloux in the event of further harm,injury to Affiant

                         be it known.  The DFL Party with Tom Perez and VC now Ken Martin

                                Complicity re Fair Housing, Reprisals to Donald Tump Supporters.

                                                  ISSUES;  

   NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER. RICO ACTS,

                          I.  Must the St. Paul Mayor, City Counsel enbanc, retract their endosements of Illhan Omar.

                          2.   Mandate Grand Jury convene on the Felonys of Omar and others.

                          3.   Reopen or Reinstate USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

                                      By information and Belief Frank Steinhauser did not agree to dismiss, however  exploiting Steinhausher for more money,Stress he just could not take it any more.

                                   DFL  Black Federal Judge Michael Davis over looked, misapplied RICO Acts via City St. Paul,MN, continuing today.

                                      Acting in Bad Behavior by NOT Refering the Criminal RICO Acts by
   City St. Paul,MN to the FBI,Justice Officials etc. 

                                     FURTHER JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS SWORE MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON MNAG ON THE QUORAN.

Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Courte could not go

Minnesota District Court
Judge:	Michael J Davis
Referred:	Steven E Rau
Case #:	0:04-cv-02632
Nature of Suit	470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause	18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Case Filed:	May 05, 2004
Re-opened:	Nov 30, 2010
Terminated:	Jul 18, 2017

• Docket
• Parties (13)
• Opinions (1)

Docket last updated: 07/24/2019 11:59 PM CDT

Wednesday, July 19, 2017
360		order Judgment (Clerk's Office Only) Wed 2:29 PM  JUDGMENT(las)
		Att: 1  Civil Notice - appeal
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
359		order Order Dismissing Case Wed 9:02 AM  ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/17. (KMW)
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
358		notice Notice (Other) Wed 3:54 PM  NOTICE by St Paul, City of Non-Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Kappelman, Ben)
357		motion Dismiss/General Wed 1:21 PM  MOTION to Dismiss/General UNOPPOSED filed by Kelly G Brisson, Mark E Meysembourg, Frank J Steinhauser, III.(Shoemaker, John)
		Att: 1  Certificate of Service via ECF

Continue to Create Account

anD further, leaving the Questions Disparate open REGARDING TRASH LAWSUIT VS. CITY, SHARON ANDERSON with over 100 Blogs Forensic Files etc.

http://sharon4anderson.org

Sharon Anderson Ward 2    Code-Corruption: SharonScarrellaAndersonexposingCitySt.PaulPonziTaxingFees

Sharon Anderson - Saint Paul Ward 2

Name: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council     
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
​Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson

Candidate Bio
Self taught Blogger Home Town, Homegrown Legal Research Analyst,tracking City Hall over 40 yrs.Similarily Situated Homeowners,Seniors,Disable and Vunerable who cannot Speak or Fight4themselves. Sharon must Educate the Public on Sharia Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re QuiTam Relator.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

Fair housing case dismissed - SCOTUSblog

                             Affiant has standing as former Candidate http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com  exposing the influx of Muslins and forced Sharia Law

                    To
Melvin Carter (politician) - WikipediaMayor City St.Paul,MN Melvin Carter,

                                             Attorney Lyndsey Olson,Ramsey Co Attorney John Choi,Sheriff Bob Fletcher, Hennepin Co Attorney Mike Freeman, employee Councilman Chris Tolbert and MNAG Muslin Keith Ellison et al

                   Affiant Widow,White,Whistleblower, current Candidate Ward 2 City Council

City

Member of the Saint Paul City Council from the 1st ward
In office January 2008 – July 2013

during the time of the Forced Demise of https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Case Detail | The FOIA Project

Case Title	JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
District	District of Columbia
City	Washington, DC
Case Number	1:2012cv01785
Date Filed	2012-11-02
Date Closed	2014-02-28
Judge	Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Plaintiff	JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant	UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Documents	Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Opinion/Order [26] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle has ruled that the Department of Housing and Urban Development conducted an adequate search and provided sufficient information in its Vaughn index and accompanying declaration to allow Huvelle to determine that the agency had properly invoked Exemption 5 (privileges) to withhold information from Judicial Watch concerning the City of St. Paul's use of a "disparate impact" theory of analysis for housing. Judicial Watch filed suit after HUD failed to respond within the statutory time limit. The agency searched 11 offices and provided a Vaughn index identifying more than 500 redacted or withheld records. Judicial Watch challenged the agency's search, noting that its declaration did not explain how the search was conducted in various offices. But Huvelle pointed out that "the government is not required to search everywhere a document might be. Instead, it is only required to search those places where a document is likely to be. Though some agencies may choose to search for responsive documents in a centralized fashion, using consistent search terms and techniques across various departments, nothing in FOIA's text or relevant case law requires an agency to do so. To the contrary, it is permissible for an agency to rely on subject matter experts to conduct individualized searches for documents when responding to FOIA requests." Huvelle rejected Judicial Watch's contention that the agency's declaration was inadequate because it did not identify which Exemption 5 privilege applied to specific documents. Huvelle noted that courts within this jurisdiction have repeatedly emphasized that a Vaughn index must simply 'indicate in some descriptive way which documents the agency is withholding and which FOIA exemptions it believes apply.'" She added that "to be sure, it would have been helpful for defendant to identify by name which specific privilege applies to which entries in its Vaughn index, as opposed to relying on [the agency's] declaration. Yet, so long as the Court is able to determine the existence of each essential element of an incorporated privilege, defendant should not be penalized for failure to identify a specific privilege by name." Judicial Watch argued the agency's declaration did not contain the elements of each privilege. But Huvelle explained "none of these alleged elements is required in order to establish the existence of the three privileges upon which defendant relies." Addressing Judicial Watch's challenge to the attorney-client privilege, she pointed out "the entries in the Vaughn index specifically identify the author and recipients of each communication, as well as the contents of the document. The narrative justifications also explicitly identify which communications were specifically 'among attorneys' and which were not. This provides a sufficient basis for plaintiff and the Court to assess whether an attorney-client relationship existed and whether the content of the communications was confidential." Issues: Adequacy - Search, Exemption 5 - Privileges
User-contributed Documents

Ilhan Nur Said Elmi^[1]

October 4, 1981 (age 37)
Mogadishu, Somalia

Ilhan Omar's real name is Ilhan Nur Said Elmi and she entered the ...

https://www.neogaf.com › Discussions › Politics Discussion

         
Ilhan Omar - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia IN THE MATTER OF ETHICS OF MUSLIN CONGRESS WOMAN OMAR IIHAN

AKA

Ethics Complaint Filed Against Ilhan Omar For Alleged Fraud – Right Wing Folks

ShareTweet

Judicial Watch announced on Tuesday that it has filed an ethics complaint against Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN) with the House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics for potential immigration, marriage, tax, and student loan fraud.
In press release posted Tuesday, the government watchdog announced that it has submitted “a hand-delivered ethics complaint to Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics David Skaggs calling for a full investigation into potential crimes tied to allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have married her biological brother.”

Omar, who is one of the four members of the so-called “Squad” of far-left freshman Democratic congresswomen embroiled in a public feud with President Trump, has been the subject of a series of reports claiming immigration and marriage fraud.
In a statement included in the release, Judical Watch President Tom Fitton says the evidence that Omar may have violated the law is “overwhelming” and that the House is obligated to “urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing” by the freshman congresswoman.
In the complaint (full text below), Fitton states that “substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.”
“The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by [David] Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson,” the complaint reads. “It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.”
Among the claims presented in Steinberg’s investigative report is that Omar married her alleged biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, “in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom,” Fitton states. That alleged immigration fraud scheme may have helped Elmi secure federally backed student loans so he could attend North Dakota State University along with Omar, he writes.

The complaint also details that the State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board “has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds” and that she submitted “joint” tax returns in 2014 and 2015 “with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.”
Below is the complete text of the ethics complaint:
Ethics Complaint Against Rep. Ilhan Omar Concerning Possible Violations of Federal and State Law
Dear Chairman Skaggs,
Judicial Watch is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation, promoting transparency, accountability and integrity in government and fidelity to the rule of law. We regularly monitor congressional ethics issues as part of our anti-corruption mission.
This letter serves as an official complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).
Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.
Such violations would also breach the Code of Ethics for Government Service, to which all federal officeholders are subject, “Any person in Government service should uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.”) Rep. Omar actions in this suspected immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjurious statements on her Minnesota divorce filings, and falsifications on her tax returns, merit your immediate investigation.
In the words of investigative reporter David Steinberg: “The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”
The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by Mr. Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson. It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.
Documented-based reporting by Steinberg, et al. has developed the following information: Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. The couple legally divorced in 2017. In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did know where to find him. The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”
Of particular importance are archived photographs taken during a widely reported trip by Ilhan Omar to London in 2015, posted to her own Instagram account under her nickname “hameey”, in which she poses with her husband/presumed brother, Ahmed Elmi. These photographs from 2015 are documentary evidence that in fact she met up with Mr. Elmi after June 2011 and before the date she signed the divorce document in August 2017, thereby calling into question the veracity of her claim that she had not seen Mr. Elmi since June 2011.
Rep. Omar’s potential crimes far exceed perjurious statements made in a Minnesota court filing.
Rep. Omar’s conduct may include immigration fraud. It appears that Rep. Omar married her brother in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.
The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars. More significantly, the Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.
Under federal law, specifically, 26 U.S. Code & 7206.1, “Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter … shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.”
Rep. Omar’s federal tax returns must be examined to determine whether any additional falsifications were made.
Mr. Steinberg, et al. have engaged in meticulous research and reporting over a period of years. They have demonstrated with a high degree of probability that Rep. Ilhan Omar has violated House Ethics Rules, federal and state laws.
We call upon the Office of Congressional Ethics to launch an investigation into Rep. Omar’s conduct immediately.
Sincerely,
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
A version of this story appears on the Daily Wire website.

Judicial Watch Sues for HUD Records of Obama Administration ...

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/judicial-watch-sues-hud-records-204035034.html

Nov 13, 2012 - United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. ... Judicial Watchseparately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data ... chief of DOJ's Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before ... On June 21, 2012, JW appealed HUD's denial of a waiver request.

Magner vs. Gallagher

blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/tag/magner-vs-gallagher/

The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved Thomas Perez as U.S. Labor Secretary, ... of the Federal Fair Housing Act. In exchange for St. Paul pulling Magner vs. ... city of St. Paul and Perez, the Assistant U.S. Attorney General, in February 2012. ... Gallagher; Comments Off on JudicialWatch.org is on the case — St. Paul's case!

You've visited this page 4 times. Last visit: 1/23/16

Political Diary: Tom Perez Has No Regrets - WSJ

https://www.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-tom-perez-has-no-regrets-1414607732

Oct 29, 2014 - It's no secret in Washington that Labor Secretary Tom Perez wants to ... on the social media network to St. Paul, Minnesota Mayor Christopher Coleman: ... In February 2012, as then-head of the Justice Department's Civil ... as “disparate impact”) under the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Mr. Perez ... Potomac Watch.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch