NEW: Ethics Complaint Filed against Rep. Ilhan Omar--Marriage, Immigrati...

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-house-ethics-complaint-against-rep-ilhan-omar-over-potential-immigration-marriage-tax-and-student-loan-fraud/

                Thurs.25July2019

U.S. District Judge Michael J. Davis faces a decision on sending convicted Islamic State sympathizers to prison or to a “deradicalization” program. PHOTO: JERRY HOLT/MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE/ZUMA PRESS

https://www.wsj.com/articles/deradicalization-programs-face-critical-test-in-islamic-state-cases-1479084156

                    Fri.26July2019         Newly Discovered

           NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW,CONSTITUTIONS AND EVEN THE QUORAN.
Ilhan Omar Could be Deported Because of This Lawsuit

Next, Klayman pointed to the fact that Omar was living in Kenya when she was granted citizenship.

DISCLAIMER; Sharon tracking USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher

cannot afford to open the Files via Federal Judge Michael Davis,

          IN THE MATTER OF MINNESOTA MUSLIN CONGRESS WOMAN

              IIHAN OMAR AKA Ilhan Nur Said Elmi^{[1]  OTHERS AS INTEREST APPEAR.}

                                      VS

              CANDIDATE RELATOR WHITE,WIDOW,WHISTLEBLOWER

                     SHARON ANDERSON ET AL

       Affiant Sick and Tired of City St. Paul in their Patterned Enterprise

Complaints here with made via email,social media etc.

                   Can;t open the Files with Federal Judge dfl Michael Davis, wilful failure to address or have Jury Trial on Citys RICO ACTS or refer to Justice Dept or FBI.

                    Sharon again Candidate Ward 2 from her Legal Domicile at 1058 Summit St. Paul,MN Equity skimming for years. http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

                    https://freedom-4you.blogspot.com/2008/08/

                        Mr. Kindness Lenny Anderson Trash Testimony

https://lennycarolanderson.blogspot.com/

Sharon Anderson Ward 2

---

From: sharon4anderson@aol.com

Sent: 7/25/2019 3:02:03 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Ethics Complaint Filed Against Ilhan Omar For Alleged Fraud – Right Wing Folks

                                   Fri.25July2019

                  Kevin,Dave Chaloux in the event of further harm,injury to Affiant

                         be it known.  The DFL Party with Tom Perez and VC now Ken Martin

                                Complicity re Fair Housing, Reprisals to Donald Tump Supporters.

                                                  ISSUES;  

   NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER. RICO ACTS,

                          I.  Must the St. Paul Mayor, City Counsel enbanc, retract their endosements of Illhan Omar.

                          2.   Mandate Grand Jury convene on the Felonys of Omar and others.

                          3.   Reopen or Reinstate USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

                                      By information and Belief Frank Steinhauser did not agree to dismiss, however  exploiting Steinhausher for more money,Stress he just could not take it any more.

                                   DFL  Black Federal Judge Michael Davis over looked, misapplied RICO Acts via City St. Paul,MN, continuing today.

                                      Acting in Bad Behavior by NOT Refering the Criminal RICO Acts by
   City St. Paul,MN to the FBI,Justice Officials etc. 

                                     FURTHER JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS SWORE MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON MNAG ON THE QUORAN.

Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Courte could not go

Minnesota District Court
Judge:	Michael J Davis
Referred:	Steven E Rau
Case #:	0:04-cv-02632
Nature of Suit	470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause	18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Case Filed:	May 05, 2004
Re-opened:	Nov 30, 2010
Terminated:	Jul 18, 2017

• Docket
• Parties (13)
• Opinions (1)

Docket last updated: 07/24/2019 11:59 PM CDT

Wednesday, July 19, 2017
360		order Judgment (Clerk's Office Only) Wed 2:29 PM  JUDGMENT(las)
		Att: 1  Civil Notice - appeal
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
359		order Order Dismissing Case Wed 9:02 AM  ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/17. (KMW)
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
358		notice Notice (Other) Wed 3:54 PM  NOTICE by St Paul, City of Non-Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Kappelman, Ben)
357		motion Dismiss/General Wed 1:21 PM  MOTION to Dismiss/General UNOPPOSED filed by Kelly G Brisson, Mark E Meysembourg, Frank J Steinhauser, III.(Shoemaker, John)
		Att: 1  Certificate of Service via ECF

Continue to Create Account

anD further, leaving the Questions Disparate open REGARDING TRASH LAWSUIT VS. CITY, SHARON ANDERSON with over 100 Blogs Forensic Files etc.

http://sharon4anderson.org

Sharon Anderson Ward 2    Code-Corruption: SharonScarrellaAndersonexposingCitySt.PaulPonziTaxingFees

Sharon Anderson - Saint Paul Ward 2

Name: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council     
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
​Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson

Candidate Bio
Self taught Blogger Home Town, Homegrown Legal Research Analyst,tracking City Hall over 40 yrs.Similarily Situated Homeowners,Seniors,Disable and Vunerable who cannot Speak or Fight4themselves. Sharon must Educate the Public on Sharia Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re QuiTam Relator.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

Fair housing case dismissed - SCOTUSblog

                             Affiant has standing as former Candidate http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com  exposing the influx of Muslins and forced Sharia Law

                    To
Melvin Carter (politician) - WikipediaMayor City St.Paul,MN Melvin Carter,

                                             Attorney Lyndsey Olson,Ramsey Co Attorney John Choi,Sheriff Bob Fletcher, Hennepin Co Attorney Mike Freeman, employee Councilman Chris Tolbert and MNAG Muslin Keith Ellison et al

                   Affiant Widow,White,Whistleblower, current Candidate Ward 2 City Council

City

Member of the Saint Paul City Council from the 1st ward
In office January 2008 – July 2013

during the time of the Forced Demise of https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Case Detail | The FOIA Project

Case Title	JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
District	District of Columbia
City	Washington, DC
Case Number	1:2012cv01785
Date Filed	2012-11-02
Date Closed	2014-02-28
Judge	Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Plaintiff	JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant	UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Documents	Docket Complaint Complaint attachment 1 Complaint attachment 2 Opinion/Order [26] FOIA Project Annotation: Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle has ruled that the Department of Housing and Urban Development conducted an adequate search and provided sufficient information in its Vaughn index and accompanying declaration to allow Huvelle to determine that the agency had properly invoked Exemption 5 (privileges) to withhold information from Judicial Watch concerning the City of St. Paul's use of a "disparate impact" theory of analysis for housing. Judicial Watch filed suit after HUD failed to respond within the statutory time limit. The agency searched 11 offices and provided a Vaughn index identifying more than 500 redacted or withheld records. Judicial Watch challenged the agency's search, noting that its declaration did not explain how the search was conducted in various offices. But Huvelle pointed out that "the government is not required to search everywhere a document might be. Instead, it is only required to search those places where a document is likely to be. Though some agencies may choose to search for responsive documents in a centralized fashion, using consistent search terms and techniques across various departments, nothing in FOIA's text or relevant case law requires an agency to do so. To the contrary, it is permissible for an agency to rely on subject matter experts to conduct individualized searches for documents when responding to FOIA requests." Huvelle rejected Judicial Watch's contention that the agency's declaration was inadequate because it did not identify which Exemption 5 privilege applied to specific documents. Huvelle noted that courts within this jurisdiction have repeatedly emphasized that a Vaughn index must simply 'indicate in some descriptive way which documents the agency is withholding and which FOIA exemptions it believes apply.'" She added that "to be sure, it would have been helpful for defendant to identify by name which specific privilege applies to which entries in its Vaughn index, as opposed to relying on [the agency's] declaration. Yet, so long as the Court is able to determine the existence of each essential element of an incorporated privilege, defendant should not be penalized for failure to identify a specific privilege by name." Judicial Watch argued the agency's declaration did not contain the elements of each privilege. But Huvelle explained "none of these alleged elements is required in order to establish the existence of the three privileges upon which defendant relies." Addressing Judicial Watch's challenge to the attorney-client privilege, she pointed out "the entries in the Vaughn index specifically identify the author and recipients of each communication, as well as the contents of the document. The narrative justifications also explicitly identify which communications were specifically 'among attorneys' and which were not. This provides a sufficient basis for plaintiff and the Court to assess whether an attorney-client relationship existed and whether the content of the communications was confidential." Issues: Adequacy - Search, Exemption 5 - Privileges
User-contributed Documents

Ilhan Nur Said Elmi^[1]

October 4, 1981 (age 37)
Mogadishu, Somalia

Ilhan Omar's real name is Ilhan Nur Said Elmi and she entered the ...

https://www.neogaf.com › Discussions › Politics Discussion

         
Ilhan Omar - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia IN THE MATTER OF ETHICS OF MUSLIN CONGRESS WOMAN OMAR IIHAN

AKA

Ethics Complaint Filed Against Ilhan Omar For Alleged Fraud – Right Wing Folks

ShareTweet

Judicial Watch announced on Tuesday that it has filed an ethics complaint against Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN) with the House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics for potential immigration, marriage, tax, and student loan fraud.
In press release posted Tuesday, the government watchdog announced that it has submitted “a hand-delivered ethics complaint to Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics David Skaggs calling for a full investigation into potential crimes tied to allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have married her biological brother.”

Omar, who is one of the four members of the so-called “Squad” of far-left freshman Democratic congresswomen embroiled in a public feud with President Trump, has been the subject of a series of reports claiming immigration and marriage fraud.
In a statement included in the release, Judical Watch President Tom Fitton says the evidence that Omar may have violated the law is “overwhelming” and that the House is obligated to “urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing” by the freshman congresswoman.
In the complaint (full text below), Fitton states that “substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.”
“The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by [David] Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson,” the complaint reads. “It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.”
Among the claims presented in Steinberg’s investigative report is that Omar married her alleged biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, “in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom,” Fitton states. That alleged immigration fraud scheme may have helped Elmi secure federally backed student loans so he could attend North Dakota State University along with Omar, he writes.

The complaint also details that the State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board “has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds” and that she submitted “joint” tax returns in 2014 and 2015 “with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.”
Below is the complete text of the ethics complaint:
Ethics Complaint Against Rep. Ilhan Omar Concerning Possible Violations of Federal and State Law
Dear Chairman Skaggs,
Judicial Watch is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation, promoting transparency, accountability and integrity in government and fidelity to the rule of law. We regularly monitor congressional ethics issues as part of our anti-corruption mission.
This letter serves as an official complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).
Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.
Such violations would also breach the Code of Ethics for Government Service, to which all federal officeholders are subject, “Any person in Government service should uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.”) Rep. Omar actions in this suspected immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjurious statements on her Minnesota divorce filings, and falsifications on her tax returns, merit your immediate investigation.
In the words of investigative reporter David Steinberg: “The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”
The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by Mr. Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson. It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.
Documented-based reporting by Steinberg, et al. has developed the following information: Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. The couple legally divorced in 2017. In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did know where to find him. The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”
Of particular importance are archived photographs taken during a widely reported trip by Ilhan Omar to London in 2015, posted to her own Instagram account under her nickname “hameey”, in which she poses with her husband/presumed brother, Ahmed Elmi. These photographs from 2015 are documentary evidence that in fact she met up with Mr. Elmi after June 2011 and before the date she signed the divorce document in August 2017, thereby calling into question the veracity of her claim that she had not seen Mr. Elmi since June 2011.
Rep. Omar’s potential crimes far exceed perjurious statements made in a Minnesota court filing.
Rep. Omar’s conduct may include immigration fraud. It appears that Rep. Omar married her brother in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.
The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars. More significantly, the Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.
Under federal law, specifically, 26 U.S. Code & 7206.1, “Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter … shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.”
Rep. Omar’s federal tax returns must be examined to determine whether any additional falsifications were made.
Mr. Steinberg, et al. have engaged in meticulous research and reporting over a period of years. They have demonstrated with a high degree of probability that Rep. Ilhan Omar has violated House Ethics Rules, federal and state laws.
We call upon the Office of Congressional Ethics to launch an investigation into Rep. Omar’s conduct immediately.
Sincerely,
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
A version of this story appears on the Daily Wire website.

Judicial Watch Sues for HUD Records of Obama Administration ...

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/judicial-watch-sues-hud-records-204035034.html

Nov 13, 2012 - United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. ... Judicial Watchseparately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data ... chief of DOJ's Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before ... On June 21, 2012, JW appealed HUD's denial of a waiver request.

Magner vs. Gallagher

blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/tag/magner-vs-gallagher/

The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved Thomas Perez as U.S. Labor Secretary, ... of the Federal Fair Housing Act. In exchange for St. Paul pulling Magner vs. ... city of St. Paul and Perez, the Assistant U.S. Attorney General, in February 2012. ... Gallagher; Comments Off on JudicialWatch.org is on the case — St. Paul's case!

You've visited this page 4 times. Last visit: 1/23/16

Political Diary: Tom Perez Has No Regrets - WSJ

https://www.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-tom-perez-has-no-regrets-1414607732

Oct 29, 2014 - It's no secret in Washington that Labor Secretary Tom Perez wants to ... on the social media network to St. Paul, Minnesota Mayor Christopher Coleman: ... In February 2012, as then-head of the Justice Department's Civil ... as “disparate impact”) under the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Mr. Perez ... Potomac Watch.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch